Showing posts with label fintech startups. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fintech startups. Show all posts

The Use-Case Canvas for PaymentGenes

https://paymentgenes.com
PaymentGenes is a Amsterdam based company offering consulting and recruitment services to Payment & Fintech companies.

The Use-Case Canvas for 1 use-case of the company is shown below. The use-case in focus is where the company offers consulting services to payment startups.

paymentgenes

New Year Resolutions for Fintech for 2017


The year 2017 will play an important role in the growth of Fintech. Some of the resolutions which will drive growth in this area are:

Address security concerns & strengthen backend infrastructure – both in the transaction as well as the platform. Businesses involving online transfers of money such as e-payments, online money transfers and crowdfunding carry the most risk.

Scale to compete with incumbents – scale will lead to economies which will further drive competitiveness.

Adhere to new regulation – with the rise of Fintech, regulators are becoming active in order to stay ahead of the curve. Fintech startups must find the right balance between providing a value-added service and adhering to regulation.

Build a profitable business model – building a profitable business is a necessity as it is not possible to forceful tactics to drive incumbents out of the market.

Enhance customer experience by ensuring promises are delivered – to get a foot into this space, a very high standard of service is required.

Enhanced usage of the blockchain – the advantages of a distributed ledger must be utilized as a tool to deliver enhanced value and build differentiation.

Robo Advisory – An opportunity which is here to stay

robo advisors

If you spoke about investing your money in stocks, bonds etc., you always had to read up to take calls or had to look for financial advisers to help you with the same. The first option was risky and time consuming as you had only limited knowledge and the second one was expensive.

In came the age of Robo-Advisors, i.e. online algorithms which understand your investment requirements and structure your portfolio accordingly. Robo-adviros were able to add value to the retail investing ecosystem in many ways.

Value created for Users

-     Cheaper & Less Prone to Errors: because of low human involvement in the process. Fees generally lie in between the 0.3-0.5% range, as compared to fees of financial advisors which tend to be over 1% depending on the portfolio size

-     User Control & Transparency: users are in control of their investments and can easily track their portfolio

-     User Experience: most platforms offer users a very ‘human-like’ interactive platform

Value created for the Platform

-     Scalable: scaling is easier with an automated platform. No (or very little) additional resources would be required when adding users

-     Incremental Improvements: an algorithm can be tried, tested and improved upon incrementally. Human advice has more subjectivity and is more difficult to do so

Now that we see that there is value created for users, we can work out some use cases for robo-advisory. Use cases can be based on end use or a potential user.

Use Cases based on End Use:

Event driven: users may want to save up for some future event such as a child’s wedding, a child’s education etc.

Future purchase driven: users may want to save money to buy something in the future like a house, assets like jewellery, assets to start a business and so on.

Personal goals driven: users may want to start saving and investing their money to grow personal wealth or save for retirement or saving for an emergency etc.

Use Cases based on Potential Customers:

Young people in a job: looking to grow personal savings, buying assets like house and jewellery

Parents: wanting to invest for their children’s education, marriage

Aging people: looking to plan their retirement

Game Theory Applied to the Growth of Fintech

Game Theory involves the study and construction of models of different decision nodes and the outputs resulting from them. The players involved, which may include individuals, corporates or any other organizations, have different options to choose from and do so based on the payoffs they expect from it.

The current state of Fintech startups presents itself as a very interesting game, the decisions of which will impact the growth and future of this upcoming space.

My understanding of the current Fintech space and the game which can be constructed based on it is as follows:

game theory applied to finance


The Players:
The players of the game include a Fintech startup & an Incumbent (like a Bank).

Possible Actions:

Fintech startup – can either Compete or Cooperate with incumbents.

Incumbent – can either Compete, Cooperate or Ignore.

Payoffs:

If the Incumbent & the Startup Compete – the startup has certain advantages in terms of focus, agility and cost and can gain a good market share in the particular focus area. However, the incumbent, owing to its size and customer base, will have an advantage.

If the Incumbent Competes & the Startup Cooperates – again, the result will be as above as the incumbent holds advantages of scale and existing customer base.

If the Incumbent Cooperates & the Startup Competes – a startup wanting to compete with an incumbent looking to cooperate will prove detrimental for the startup. Startups will find it very difficult to match the advantages an incumbent has owing to scale and the data it owns. Also an incumbent can easily find another startup looking to cooperate.

If the Incumbent & Startup Cooperate – this seems like the best case scenario for both as the synergies between the cost advantages of a startup and the scale advantages of an incumbent can result in significant value creation.

If the Incumbent Ignores & the Startup Competes – the startup will gain advantages as the incumbent is not willing to react to the former’s progress and is losing out business in that area of its business.

If the Incumbent Ignores & the Startup Cooperates – since the incumbent has chosen to ignore the startup’s actions, the payoff remains as above.

Finding the Equilibrium:

Looking at the Startup’s payoffs, it should always choose to Cooperate as the payoffs are higher for it in either of the options selected by the incumbent. The same holds for the Incumbent as well. Hence, Cooperate-Cooperate is where the equilibrium lies.

Startup Model – Short Term Finance to SMEs

THE MODEL: A startup which offers SMEs access to short term financing with no paperwork. Typically finance is offered to fund gaps in cash flows and for stock purchases.

STARTUP: Iwoca (British startup)

online credit facility

WHAT I LIKE

Core Idea – Access to short term financing for SMEs.

Benefits to Users – Users can get funds by simply linking their online accounts (such as Paypal, Amazon etc.) or by uploading bank statements. An offer is given within hours of doing so. Loans are unsecured and have no documentation or origination fee attached.

Ease of Use – Loans are approved and available within hours. Money can be transferred to your bank account 24*7 and interest is charged pro rata based on the time you take to repay the loan.

CONCERNS

Competition – The startup is competing with banks and other established financial institutions. Building trust will be key.

Asset Performance – Lending to SMEs without collateral is risky. Bad debts can be an issue of concern.