I was watching Shark Tank yesterday and came across this.
Some investments were done where the investor took less equity in the company
and asked for a royalty instead. For example, an entrepreneur was wanting to
raise a $100,000 investment and was willing to offload upto 15% in his company.
The investor instead asked for 10% royalty on sales till the investment of 100K
was received back and then a 1% royalty till perpetuity.
The benefits of investors taking a royalty are for both
sides.
For Entrepreneurs:
They don’t need to offload equity, and at the same time get support and mentoring by the investor. Also royalties are
generally structured keeping gross margins in mind, so that the business and it’s
growth does not suffer because of it. The only downside is that royalties are
generally till perpetuity and hence act as a permanent part of your cost
structure.
For Investors:
Rather than looking for a one time repayment (through a stake sale), royalties
ensure that the investment put into a startup keeps coming back in small
amounts, thereby reducing the risk. Also if the startup grows, the royalties
will grow as well.
Royalties
is an option we should consider, especially for a sales oriented startup, when we
are dealing with investors.
No comments:
Post a Comment
What do you have to say about this post?